1080p vs 1440p fps reddit. I will stay at 1080p and play with around 100 FPS.

1080p vs 1440p fps reddit I built my current PC in May 2014 and decided to go for 1440p/60 with the Asus PB278q. What's even the point of playing so much above your monitor refresh rate? Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. At this point 1440p is the sweet spot. in fact; you see more on 1440p because you literally have more pixels. The thing is 1080p will look worse on a 1440p monitor than on a 1080p or 4K Monitor. Besides that, 1440p would be better for casual I run ACC on triple 1440p on a 3080, with DLSS set to quality and some settings adjusted down to HIGH from EPIC. What could I I recently got an Acer Predator PHN16-71 with an RTX 4060, and I’m trying to decide between a 1080p or 1440p display for gaming. This Subreddit is community run and does not represent NVIDIA in any capacity Even with a 1080p (1920x1080) monitor, 1440p (2560×1440) and 4k (3840x2160) is amazing looking compared to 1080p. -Quality FSR at 1440p is comparable to 1080p with Sharpening on a 1080p display, and I gain around 5% FPS. that you got more FPS at 1440p was just coincidence you would have gotten the same FPS at 1080p in that raid. Or check it out in the app stores The correct answer, hands down without a doubt, would be to go with a 240hz 1080p over a 1440p monitor with a lower refresh rate. Even DLDSR 2. This is why people say eGPUs are made for 60 FPS gaming. Your cpu should be able to do that. I don't wanna turn the graphics down cuz I prefer the graphics quality over resolution Well in that case it doesn’t really matter which resolution you choose. Or check it out in the app stores 1440p vs 1080p for shooter games Question I was talking to a friend last night, debating about upgrading my video card and monitor (1070 Ti and 1080p @144hz) to something like a 2080/1080 Ti used and 1440p @144hz. I think that playing max Most streamers play 1080p, most gamers strive for that quality, and most games look good and run well at 1080p. Just browsing through reddit for example is significantly sharper with a 1440p monitor than with 1080p. Xbox Series X | S sub with the right name Discussion • Fan made • Games • Leaks • PC • News • Rumors • Reddit All things Xbox consoles and PC. Reply reply I'm thinking about upgrading to 1440p from a 1080p monitor, but concerned about too big of an FPS drop when playing SkyrimSE with graphical mods & an enb (high pre-set). So if you own a 1440p high refresh monitor, OR a 240hz, explain why you think its the better option. Just wanted to know which is usually better for gaming or if it doesn't matter all that much? and am I still better 1440p is 1. Best combo of performance and value. Going from 1080 to 1440 is definitely an improvement with the same graphic settings and similar quality monitors. Is the change worth it for 1440p? Is the difference noticeable? EDIT: Thank you very much everyone "1440p is 1. The 4080 gives out solid 1440p at 120+ FPS Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. meaning at least 90ish fps. 1080p is 1920x1080 resolution, or 2,073,600 pixels being drawn on the screen. You got almost same specs as i do, I have a 2070, and I run all my games on 1440p high settings with more than acceptable FPS depending on game demands. i play at that rez and am fine I am now getting 60 fps everywhere and a very clean image 99. 9% of the time. Reply reply fartman_tim Strange I get 1440 feels better than 1080p, targets at long distance appear sharper. For most people who use pc to game, I think high fps 1080p is still perfect. A. It’s a huge difference. I can go higher on detail but framerate drops. 78x + dlss gives you really good antialiasing without killing frame rates. I’m now on 3440x1440 Ultrawide and I • 1440p is just the resolution, not pixel density nor screen size. If you are not on a I've seen people willing to push through 1440p high or even medium settings for 40/50fps with their 1070s/1080s when they could easily clear 1080p Currently playing on a 1080p monitor with a RTX 4070, 32GB of RAM and 7800X3D. Best bang for the buck right now, unless the AOC 24G2 is in stock 1440p 144hz » Acer Nitro for budget, LG27GP850-B or Asus VG27AQ for mid range - IPS, Reddit favorite monitors. A community for pros and newbs. I first upgraded to the 3080 Ti and then upgraded my monitor from 24. Planning to buy a QHD 1440p monitor. Personally, I'm getting to the age where while I notice a difference, it doesn't greatly affect my enjoyability. 1080p content is made for less pixels. Best combos of performance and value. I had also 27” 1080p and this is too small I recently upgraded my PC and if I play at 1080p I get around 240-250fps. (As the other person replied, 27 inch 1080 looks pretty bad) 1440p wouldn’t be terrible but you’d definitely be sacrificing a fair amount of frames. Lans will still use 1080p 1080p has been the standard for gaming for the entire last decade. In terms of FPS loss while gaming that is. So in theory if you can pull 144 FPS at 1080p in game, at 1440p in you'll get 81 FPS using the same settings. While a higher res might make the game look better, having a Honestly the difference between 1080p and 1440p is pretty staggering, especially on anything at or above 27". I ended up spending extra Trying to get over double the fps at 1440p is quite a bit more taxing than getting 60fps at 4k. So it is technically very possible for the game to run a higher fps while the underlying mechanics are standard 60fps. Ultra looks exactly the same—but costs me about 15 FPS. I Take for instance, GTA V. Obviously depends on your build, but any mid - high tier build shouldn’t really be on 1080p anymore imo, you can get good frames on 1440p. he just turned 9 and plays on a Nintendo Switch Lite and he doesn't know a thing about 1080p vs 1440p I just want him on a bigger screen and so he's able to sit Also im not including the fps difference between the 2 resolutions Locked post. 3060ti is better for 100+ fps on 1080p. I care about graphics, resolution, fps. Or check it out in the app stores games are getting less and less optimised these days and even the 7900 gre which im planning to get is getting like 80 fps in 1440p ultra in hell divers 2 . Just use the one that feels comfortable and go with that, I'm too lazy to be switching to 1080p just So I’m deciding between these two monitors for my Xbox Series X. Search up the specific monitors on rtings as there can be massive difference between 2 monitors of the same type even. I'm playing at 1440p with most settings on low or medium, the lowest my framerate dips is 50 fps, I use vsync so it caps at 60 fps but without that on I sometimes get I’ve got a 3070 with i7 10700k and could probably max out battlefield v on 100 FPS on a 1440p display. 77 times as many pixels, so the FPS will be roughly 1/1. You definitely won't get an FPS increase by switching to higher resolutions. This seems a bit low to me. The 5700XT however won't be able to get 60 fps in every game in 1440p without lower graphics setting ( FSR and RSR can help but buying a 1440p monitor and playing on lower resolution with upscaling compensation feel like a waste ). The difference is insanely noticeable. Higher resoultion requires more graphic memory. That isn't always the case, sometimes you'll get more frames and sometimes you'll get less depending on My main query is that would it be worth to stick to 1080p but higher refresh rate or go 1440p but accept that some more demanding games will need to be limited to 60fps for stable frame? I've also heard that 90FPS and over feels different than 60fps, I don't really know what this mean but I wouldn't want to go to a higher FPS then have hardware limitation forcing me to lower FPS. Reply reply 1080p vs 1440p, however, feels like 60hz vs 165hz. There is zero way that upscaling to 1440p but still using a 1080p If you're going for at 27" monitor, plase don't go for a 1080p one. I doubt that'll be the case since it I am curious to see how many of you with high-end setups opt for either 1440p at 60fps or 1080p at higher framerates (120/144). To get the definitive answer to this question, just write the resolutions at the end of the card and processor name and IPS displays suck for displaying blacks. 0. It's not as good as being able to test on a native 144Hz screen, but better then nothing. Dell pretty much stopped selling 24-25” when the 27” models came down to reasonable consumer prices. Didn't feel the difference was big enough I am looking to buy a new monitor and have come to the dilemma of buying either 1440p or 1080p. FPS has ranged from 39 to 101 depending I recently built a PC using a "meager" Ryzen 5 3600 and RTX2060KO Ultra (waiting to upgrade to RTX 3070) and I get an easy 170fps on my 170hz IPS monitor in 1440p. 1440p and 4K still remain very niche. I know game settings make a huge difference. Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now still at 1440p. Very much depends on your budget and what exactly you plan to get. Also, when I downscale my 1440p monitors resolution to 1080p it increases my fps by about 40 as it should. So 27in 1440p is a middle ground essentially. Card can actually handle 1440p exceptionally well. My Monitor is 1440p 165hz. Well the 3060 was marketed as a high fps 1080p card. I tried HLL on a friends 1440p monitor and it definitely took me some time to adjust to spotting enemies from far away , in the bushes , peaking heads from long distances , etc. 144hz -> 165hz is actually quite noticeable and I can't live without it. My dream setup would be 360hz monitor with 1440p and play on max settings. and if you can hit 360 fps 1080p the chances are you gonna see In 1440p RX600 can't handle high graphics settings. The smaller size of the monitor allows you to be more 'locked in', not moving your eyes/head around and having everything in your peripheral vision (especially important for flicks in tac-fps games). The more FPS you get, the larger the relative performance drop of an eGPU. 1080p vs 1440p help upvotes The unofficial but officially recognized Reddit community 32" 1440p vs 27" 1080p not so noticable but a 32" 1080p vs a 27" 1440p is going to be very noticeable (worse quality) for productivity/regular gaming, a 32" 1080p would be pretty shitty, i can tell you that right now but for iracing, a trip 32" 1080p setup would allow you to push your graphic settings while keeping frames up without breaking 24in 1080p 144hz - » LG 24GN650-B - IPS, fast response time, 144hz, HDR10. I would recommend a 7800xt or 4070. Obviously 1440p @144hz will I alternate between my 1440p 165hz Ultrawide 34" and my 4k 60hz 55" TV depending on game and where I want to sit. 77 times more pixels than 1080p. Everything becomes a lot sharper and detailed in addition to much less aliasing, especially for stuff in the distance. iRacing stable 165 fps on low detail (high detail on cars). In the end I picked the right choice for me. That's right. High is great and it all disappears. Hardware Hi, I have a 1080ti and a 3440x1440 monitor and 90% of the time get 40-45 fps with everything at ultra. Ultrawide 1440p 144hz 1440p is not all its cracked up to be on Xbox. The 3080 is a perfect card for 1440P and high FPS gaming, however if you prefer higher graphic resolutions(4K), the 3080 at 4K will struggle to maintain even 120 FPS(online gaming AAA titles). That thing is capable of bigger and better things, then again it does depend on the game. Cyberpunk 2077 i run high settings, adjusted for maximum fps such as DLSS performance mode which makes my run at 100 fps, which is really good for a game like that. However, dlss reduces this decrease. If I go to 1440p, the FPS drops to around 170-180. I get 144 FPS pretty consistently (@ 1440p) and it's super nice playing at both high refresh rate and high res. And the 3060ti is more than powerful enough for 1440p high FPS. I will stay at 1080p and play with around 100 FPS. ugliness from foliage. 6 A 1440p monitor has more pixels. - Reddit favorite mid-range monitor. I don’t see the point in sacrificing a smoother experience for the sake of more pixels on a screen. But in 1080p it’s so smooth and my mouse even feels faster than it feels in 1440p. 1080p monitor vs 1440p monitor for fps games? comments r/apexlegends r/apexlegends Community run, developer supported subreddit dedicated I would always pick 1440p DLSS Quality. Or check it out in the app stores   Also, the jump from 1440p to 4K is less than the jump from 1080p to 1440p. I think $800 is a good budget. the taa is completely borked, for rdr2 30 fps is clearer than 60 fps and also 1440p or 1. Even if you downscale the pixels are still there. In terms of how crisp it looks 23" at 1080p vs 27" at 1440p, the 1440p won't be too much crisper due the larger size Normally it's the games that don't have temporal antialiasing. 1440p is the good middle ground right now in terms of value and capabilities. Sometimes thanks to dlss. I’m hoping to get some advice on which In modern games, absolutely, TAA + 1080p is very blurry. I'm currently using a 23. 4k is still crisper, edges appear sharper and certain textures are cleaner. I managed to get an RTX 3070 for my new build (i5-12400). The price on these monitors are very affordable right now. probably harder with 1440p. there are smaller 1440p screens and bigger 1080p screens. EDIT: I'll probably get downvoted for saying this, but beyond 40-45 fps or so I stop noticing the difference. To stop this simply do not go full screen with 1080p content on 1080p vs. I mainly play fps games like csgo and valorant and occasionally Dota 2, i was planning to try out triple A games once i get my 3080. the 1080p is cheaper, and got a 240Hz when the 1440p got 165Hz. I disagree, I also have this issue Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. 0 so the 120 with HDR isn't an option unless I've been playing a competitive shooter on 1440p on my native 1440p 27" monitor. The 3060 ti is way First of all, my avg fps is like 100, with 90 around downtown. Additionally if you are doing 1080p on a 1440p monitor the pixels don't divide Surprisingly, 1440p isn't all that hard to push compared to 1080p; 4k on the other hand is a performance nightmare unless you are fine with 60fps on solid hardware. From personal experience, I find that having a higher fps has a better gaming experience. The 1440p just feels and looks so much better but the difference in terms of skill isn't really that much. I would recommend 1080p if you have a 1080p monitor. And by the way, 240Hz is too much, you can save some money on your monitor and put on something else. Like I said before, the price difference between a 1440p and 1080p monitor is only about $50 nowadays. So thats not an issue. 25x (1620p) looked way worse on 1080p than 1440p native. Obviously, I don’t want to use 1080p on a 1440p monitor, so does anyone have an explanation as to why this might be happening? Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. 5" 1080p to 27" 1440p. I have one of the cheapest 1440p 144Hz VA panels and I love it. So playing on mid-settings in 1440p and having 60-70 FPS there is no reason to have a 165Hz monitor. FPS indicates the smoothness of the video, but not the picture quality. So I just wanted to ask if anyone has some experience making the switch between them? Is it They are likely talking about their minimum for the size. I'm playing Starfield on Ultra settings and enjoying the game without any visual issues. 033 seconds in order to properly capture movement. 60fps v 144 fps is still hard to tell if you're going from 60->144. . The difference in image quality, however, is not. I got 60-70 FPS on cyberpunk. Games with temporal AA do look better when you increase rendering resolution - and you don't need to go all the way to 1440p. I realised that visuality may suffer in woods and gray areas of the map. Technology has finally also pushed where most esports games where 1440p/1080p have the same fps. 0 mod and around 120+FPS on Raytracing Ultra + extended options all turned to maximum. I went from the 1080p to a 24" 4k to a 34" 1440p ultrawide. Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. Hi Guys, I'm currently using a 27" 120hz 1080p monitor for my Series S. if you would make longer and test and log averages you would see the But it was a hard choice choosing between 1080p 144hz or 1440p IPS 60hz. I use a 27” 1440p at work and the eyeballed sharpness difference between the two isn’t worth arguing over. A 3060 might have a hard time running a bunch of games at 1440p, but your games should be fine if you're ready to lose out on some FPS. 1440 is definitely the sweet spot, doesn't require you to be buying a flagship GPU every year just to run games at a playable fps and still looks decent. The reason pro players play 1080p is probably bc of framerate. Prefer high fps over fidelity. Were as Playing 1080p 60 fps games on a 1440p 144hz monitor upvotes · comments r/cyberpunkgame r/cyberpunkgame Cyberpunk 2077 is a role-playing video game developed by CD Projekt RED and published by CD Projekt S. 24" should be 1080p or greater. 120 fps at 1440p vs 120 fps at 1080p is the same to a CPU. so almost double the number wich would roundaboud half your fps. Please feel free to My old main monitor was 1080p 165 hz, and I didn’t know if I wanted 1440p 165hz or 1080p 240hz. I currently have a 24in, 60ghz, 1080p monitor. If possible both framerate and res. And Xbox is a loser for that resolution. Sharpening is on 80% for all 1080p screenshots. A video like this can give you a bit of an idea between the differences of 60Hz and 144Hz. Monitors used: Asus VG248QE (1080P) | MSI G274QPX (1440P). But I watched the guy set the resolution to 1080p, 1440p and 4k and the fps didn't seem to change much if at all whatever he selected. Recently tried playing on rtx 2060 1080p 144hz monitor and while getting around 70-80 fps, the image lagged and i just quit. 1 TV, you can choose between the best of both worlds. 7 (or something like that, dont remember exactly) pixels on the monitor, and thats why the Im between 2: 24' 1080p and 27' 1440p. FPS, MMO. I'd rather have 400 fps on 1440p than 500 fps on 1080p. But I recently bought that is still on the way, a 28in, 144ghz, 1440p monitor, but I want to know how much will a higher resolution hurt my fps? (The display measurements are not diagonal, they are width) System specs: Ryzen 5 5600x, Radeon RX 6700 XT, 16gb dual channel ddr4. If you start considering changes in screen size too, things get complicated due to changes in . I would get minimum 6700xt or 3060ti. TAA was an excellent innovation in real-time graphics, but it has made games look significantly 'softer'. I'm using it with a 15 year old 1080p 60Hz monitor for the time being, which is obviously not ideal (I had been using laptops in the past years). When I play a 15 man creative free for all I get a constant like 200fps in 1440p and 1080p. New comments cannot be posted. ) Problem with the article though is not making the distinction between 60fps hurtbox/hitboxes and 120fps animations. Back a few years ago, high end cards could handle 1080p but that’s it. Inspired by another post in this subreddit, I wanted to test if AMD's Sharpening effect on 1080p resolution could go head to head against native 1440p. 3080 with 5800x3D on 1440p here. For 1080p on a 1440p monitor the computer has to stretch 1 pixel of the game to 1. I know its 9 months later, but I found this thread by searching 1080p vs 1440p on Google, so I felt clarification might be helpful And besides, 1440p compared to 1080p is just a fun upgrade plus you can find very good mid-range monitors (unless you go OLED) for $300~ or less. I also have a laptop for school with an IPS screen and it looks uglier than the Went from 1080p 144hz to 1440p 165hz and hit immortal. Night and day difference between the two, once you For me the visual difference on a monitor between 1440 and 4K is barely distinguishable, but the difference between 60fps and 144fps is huge. I play at 1440p ans stream on 1080p, I also have the available upload speed to stream 1440p, but my main concern is FPS drops, if that even is a thing when you go from 1080p stream to 1440p? Thanks :) Subjectively, the jump from 1080p to 1440p "feels" larger than the jump from 1440p to 4k part of the 1080-1440 experience is typically going from say a 21-24" 1080p monitor to a 27" 1440p monitor, and often it's a shift from a cheaper (possibly TN) panel up to a higher quality VA or IPS panel, so there are multiple factors as to why it's At playback, the difference between 30 and 60 is pretty minimal to the human eye, and in the real world very few things move fast enough that you need to take a picture more than once every . Or check it out in the app stores Edit: a 1440p monitor at 60 fps max settings is absolutley playable frames. For instance, I have a GTX 980 with 4GB GPU memory, and just running 1440p eats up all the memory, which means I won't really reach high enough FPS to take full advantage of my 165Hz monitor. I have a 6800XT now and it can run any game I want at 1440p native at high FPS. The price is not that big of a difference either. Some high quality 1080p monitor will always look better than budget 1440p. He must be trying 1080p ultra and then doing 1440p medium and being like "omg how am I getting more fps. 1440p doesn’t really require all that much Linus tech did a good comparison of 1080p vs 1440p vs 4k. Honestly, I want a 27" 1440p 144hz OLED monitor for I currently have a 1080p 240hz monitor and i usually play fps/shooting games, csgo / valorant / r6 / apex legends / cod warzone etc. All screenshots are with maxed in game settings (no RTX) and native resolution (no FSR). I actually use the same TV for my pc, so I've been able to compare Xbox 1440p vs pc 1440p. For some reason I am getting around the same fps on mw2 on both my 1440p and 1080p monitor. I have a 6700k and 1080ti so I may or may not be able to push 200+ but honestly I SLI for 1080p high fps comments r/nvidia r/nvidia A place for everything NVIDIA, come talk about news, drivers, rumors, GPUs, the industry, show-off your build and more. 240hz 1080p vs 144hz 1440p Fuse,gibby,bang,bloodhound ultimates give a noticeable frame hit going from 240 down to 130 doesn’t feel nice especially in intense situations that matter so I settle at a res in between 1080p and 1440p to get the best of both worlds without such a big performance hit. Or check it out in the app stores   for example i play alot of league of legends on my 1080p resolution i got 190 lowest 240 fps max on 1440p on the other hand i got concicently over 300Frames how does that work? 1080p vs 1440p comment. But for HDR on Xbox you have to have 4k enabled and my monitor is HDMI 2. Same goes for your PC itself lower fps or lower graphical preset 1440p looks again worse. 1440p Before my 3080 I played like 1,5 years 1440p on a 2070 including Cyberpunk and it was fine. At higher resolutions it makes no difference for the CPU to push out the frames. For me, my game feels better on 1440p ultra vs 1440p with the normal mixture of pro recommended low settings. Had no pleasure. I have an i7 4770k with 2 overclocked GTX 780s in SLI, and it can still handle most games at max settings at 1440p/60fps. even but for sure it was more than 200 FPS avg. Open comment sort options 1440p vs 1080p vs 4K Your community-run home for all things PlayStation on Reddit! Console/game discussions, news, support, trophy/media sharing and more! Yeah, I'm gonna get a 1440p 27 inch monitor, I could test 1440p with virtual resolution on my current monitor(in cs2 and Windows res was 1440p) I had more than 250 fps average FPS(maybe it was 290 avg. Tiny Tina's Wonderland, get around 15% lower performance with FSR quality with DLDSR vs 1080p native, but still hit a solid 60 FPS. very high FPS is mostly beneficial for competitive shooters not just foir the the smoother image but for the lower let's assume it's 1. Share Sort by: Best. 1080p native on 1440p screen looks worse than 1080p native on 1080p screen, especially when it comes to games with a lot of details and moving elements. The lowest fps I’ve seen on crowded race starts was about low 70s. AKA They think 27" should at least be 1440p. The game looks so much more crisp and fluid, targets are much clearer, and I can't see any downsides so far compared to The difference between 1440p to 4k on a 27-inch display is not nearly as much of a noticeable jump compared from 1080p to 1440p. In cs2 maybe a tiny bit but it doesn't affect my playstyle in any way, its just a tad smoother but the overal sharpness of 1440p and ips colors is much better for me. The RTX 2060 But talking about 1440p and 1080p for me 1080p is enough but 1440p, a higher resolution might also push you into a better gaming performance. 1440p looks so much better for everything outside of esports, and actually puts modern gpus to work. Is 100% game changing. 1440p is 2560x1440 resolution, or 3,686,400 pixels being drawn on the screen. 24 vs 48 fps is a huge difference what if i told pro players use 1080p monitors bc pro players dont like to change their settings that they have been using for YEARS. Before you ask, my pc can run 240 fps at 1080p, and 165 fps at 1440p. Most cards today can handle 1440p with 1080p I cannot comment on the DLSS side, but I can say that the fps will decrease in native 1080p - 1440p. Up until last week, I was running my 3080 on 1080p. If you don't do any work on the computer or even browsing the web or reddit, then it's probably safe to say the difference is very small. Or check it out in the app stores   a single GTX-770 should run most games besides the absolute newest FPS at 1440p on ultra settings at over 50 fps. 1080p VS 1440p for msfs2020 . Im actually using a and 4ms It was like 5-6 years ago when 27” 1440p was $700 USD and 24” was $500. 8'' 1440p with no scaling and a 24'' 1080p display side-by-side and the difference is rather noticeable between them, so it's hardly a waste. The difference in quality is negligible for most things with a few exceptions. Realistically, games just don't support 1440p on Xbox. I find it very hard to Based on personal sentiment or even speculation, would the image quality of 1440p DLSS Performance be similar to 1080p Native? From what I've gathered, 1440p DLSS as someone who recently switched from 1080p to 1440p, 1080p gaming looks like pixel art. If you don't have one consider the dynamic resolution feature, I'm a fan of it for 1440p. But the basic concept is this. And until it does it wont be the overall sweet spot. I’ve always been a a console player so I never went past 30-60 FPS and I’ve Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. good luck having truly worth results going from 144->240. But secondly, there is no difference in fps when I downgrade from 1440p to 1080p and high/low settings don't seem to make a difference either. If i go for 1440p monitor but playing on 1080p For casual story mode games definitely 1440p, fps isn't as important for those but the higher resolution will make a big difference, and a 3060ti will be able to play pretty much everything at 1440p on high settings with at least 60fps. It seems like your rig could handle that. GPU used: Sapphire Pulse RX 6800. You can somewhat get around this by using DLDSR* with RTX cards from NVIDIA, but it can be finicky and it's still not as good as 1440p on a 1440p display. Gaming at 1440p becomes relevant once you get a laptop with an RTX 4070, for proper 4K I have a 3060ti and two 170hz 1440p gsync monitors and they’re great. theres an offer on amazon for a 27" 1440p monitor for $170 or many choices for 24"/27" 1080p for $130-ish (all 144hz+). im debating on getting On Valorant, fps matters even more because the time to kill is significantly lower than in Apex. I paid $300 for each monitor iirc. 1440p with medium settings + ultra/high textures will look better than 1080p Ultra in most games. The pixel density at 1440p is already high enough even for the most detailed games. Reply reply Healthy_BrAd6254 • The number of people in the comments that don't know 34" means 14 votes, 58 comments. 3x1440p requires a lot of power to run. Been playing with this quite a bit recently, so hope some examples here help from what I've found. It was way better 1080p native, though. If you view some benchmarks 1440p can be significantly lower, take cyberpunk for example. r/LenovoLegion. Or check it out in the app stores   a 1440p 75hz, or a 1080p high refresh rate (165hz) with gsync. I have a RTX3080 10GB edition and play on 1440p with FSR3. In games like warzone I'm not seeing any difference at all. This subreddit has been For those who want to see the difference between a 1080p monitor and a 1440p monitor. otherwise to me personally I'll choose to use 1080p with a higher FPS. From what I've read/watched, newer cards are optimized for 1440p so when using lower resolutions like 1080p you can But upgrading to 1080p 144fps Compared to 720p 60fps. So despite having the same fps 1440p feels really bad With modern frame buffering you usually won't get screen tearing at low FPS, it will just feel slow. I play Apex Legends and other FPS games very competitively, and I’d like to know which of the two is a better option? One is a 1080p display, while the other is a 1440p display. I've got the Dell 2721DGF and use it for fast pace fps on 1440p 120 with freesync. But I will choose 150fps 1080p any day of the week. Is it really worth that 20-30 FPS drop for the higher resolution? I’m on a 27” monitor but deciding whether I should switch to a 1080P 24” one just to get closer to that 144fps mark. I‘d still prefere 1080p, cause you also get more FPS when you play on 1080p. true I went from 1080p 60hz to 1440p 144/165/hz with my 7800 XT and got a huge boost in FPS and game performance. I play a lot of games. 1080p ultra wise, it seems it can handle 120+fps, without any changes. Im fine with my monitor, but never saw an 1440p monitor in my life before and was trying to realise if its worth it the extra pixels for the fps sacrifice. As long as people prefer 1440p at 100+ fps vs 4k that may be under 60fps in some games. Old titles, New titles. Plus or minus some margin of error. Please use our Discord server instead of supporting a I have 1440p 144hz right now, but am considering a 1080p 240hz as I see that's what a lot of the pros use and If it's worth the money I'd jump for it if 240 is really that much better than 144hz. Similarly, color distortion from shitty TN viewing angles hardly matters on smaller screens. I have both 27in and a 24in 1440p (24in is old TN panel). For videos and games, the difference between 1080p and 1440p is genuinely quite subtle, which explains why you can't really tell the difference. 5x internal scale and dlss looks better I think you should not but a new 1440p monitor expecting taa to be fixed, it probably wont, i personally use mods, reshade plugins and sharpening on my 1080p monitor. 1440p 144Hz is the new golden standard IMO. Playing Uncharted 4 at 1080p native gives me around 50-70 FPS but when I set it to 4K with DLSS at performance mode the framerates hover around 25-35 FPS. Surely I had to adjust settings sometimes but it was fine to be a fluid experience. In the end if you value high frame gaming 1440P is the way to go with a 3080, it's a perfect match. I'd be wanting a stable 60FPS or above. Please use our Discord server instead of supporting a company that acts against its users and unpaid moderators. 1440p native I feel is the sweet spot for most hardware atm, since that resolution a lot of new hardware 3060+ can get high fps, and then in some games with dldsr to 1. DLSS is on 'balanced' to hit 70fps without mod, but since the black shadow issue was fixed in the game/DLSS by now, it's no longer required to play on 'Quality'. Note: Reddit is dying due to terrible leadership from CEO /u/spez. I’m also upset 24in 1440p is basically no longer offered. Most upcoming PS5 games are going to have a quality mode and a performance mode, so as long as you have a HDMI 2. you can run the game at 240 plus stream without dipping too much. 1440p is takes a very expensive video card to run well and most 144hz stuff is really overpriced. Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now where the difference between 1080p and 1440p is a huge step and certainly noticeable, so I’d say go with the 1440p monitor I’m using a 1080p 165hz monitor now, only reasoning behind it is I play a lot of competitive FPS. " His problem literally defys the way pc gaming works. 4K EATS fps at 400% 300% I have an i7 11th gen and a 3060 laptop version, which isn't as powerful as the desktop version. The sharpness difference is noticeable. Or check it out in the app stores   1080p vs 1440p on android? upvotes (Warzone Mobile on M4 iPad Pro, 3K, up to 120 FPS, ultra settings) 0:40. -Ultra Quality FSR at 1440p is probably slightly better than a native 1080p image with Sharpening on a 1080p display, but I also loose roughly 5% performance. 24" monitors feel too small, 27" monitors (or bigger) suck at 1080p. 1440p is not that much more demanding than 1080p, you'll easily get the performance loss back with optimised settings. I would start by comparing 4k and 1080p on a I'm wondering ow much of a performance cost would it be to go from 1080p to 1440p streaming wise. I played on 1080p/240hz and on 1440p/144hz. 1440p Field of View Question So I was trying to tell one of my friends to change their FOV higher and he brought up the fact that he uses a 1440p monitor compared to my 1080p monitor and that more of the view should be showing already but I was just curious if anyone had any idea of what the difference in FOV really is between the two resolutions. ACC lowest settings with DLSS enabled and 100% res scale I get average about 140-150 FPS during race and little bit lower at the beginning of the race. Also if you do decide to buy a 1440p/4k, if you can, I highly suggest buying a monitor that can go 160hz+. 1440p@144hz for AAA games or competitive FPS where higher resolution and a bigger screen size benefits you; BRs like Apex, PUBG or things like Tarkov. Running 4k at max settings especially with Ray tracing just doesnt bring good enough fps. High FPS is when you get visual problems with the GPU trying to give the monitor too many frames. Reply reply More difference between 1080p vs Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. I have a Dell 25” 1440p from 2017. 1440p 32in is the same pixel density as 1080p 24in. i never really tried 144hz since i immediately jumped from 60hz to 240hz and i never really tried 1440p. But if you can hit 1440p with decent performance, native 1440p resolution on a 1440p monitor will definitely look better than downscaled 1440p on a 1080p Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. 1080p puts most of the stress on the cpu vs 1440p being gpu intensive. 120 FPS in performance mode with a 1080p/1440p resolution upscaled to 4k. While it looks great, when I play on 1080P, i get about 30-40 more FPS, but it looks somewhat washed due to the scaling and because its 27" My question is, if I were to get a native Went from a 240hz 1080p tn panel to a 165hz 1440p ips panel and the difference between 165 and 240hz is not that big tbh. I’d say stick with a 24 inch 1080 display. like 27" 1080p vs 27" 1440p vs 27" 4K. Members Online. I know that 1440p looks way better, but idk if taht GPU can handle it. im ordering parts for my new system (ryzen 7 5700x, radeon rx 6800, 32GB ram) and struggling to choose a monitor. Contrast is ok. It's genuinely so much clearer, and when I look at 1080p screens now I realize how crappy it and it 4k is held back by gpus. Or check it out in the app stores If you can't see the loss of details between 1440p and 1080p you should consult an ophtalmologiste. Always between 90-110 fps I have an AMD Ryzen 7 5800X, XFX RX 6800, Asus Prime B550 Plus mobo with 32gb DDR4 3200 RAM and a LG 32" 1440p monitor. 5 compared to 1080p@60Hz and 3. Or check it out in the app stores Home DLSS can help with small details, even at 1080p. Tl;dr: 4k looks pretty during static game play but becomes negligible during kinetic game play. No HDR but that's the Xbox not the monitor as it's capable. 1080p is really ancient for today. . At 1080p, the usage stays at 60-70% with the fps fluctuating from 120 and goes down to the 50s in some areas In 1440p though, usage is within the 90% range. Or 60fps 4K native in quality mode. Example: $200 1440p 180Hz IPS monitor. To my understanding using DLSS to upscale to 4K should result in similar FPS levels as native 1080p as performance mode renders at 1080p as a base and then upscales to 4K. This means, 1440p@60Hz is already 1. What you'll generally end up with, is 1080p upscaled to 1440 which looks like garbage. i currently have a laptop with 1080p and 144hz and the upgrade from 60hz was fantastic; im now in love with high refresh rate/fps and i wouldnt go for If you play fps, yes, kids here saying 1080p will not matter on 15 inches are just assuming you'll use it from 2 feet away or something, up close watching a movie or playing 1440p on a realistic game it does make tons of difference, there are certain content creation/ content consumption laptops that go to 4k because it can be noticed, yeah not if you're playing fps then no get However, with 1440P I know there will be a drop in fps compared to 1080P. The difference between 1080p and 2160p is large though, unlike 720p and 1080p or 1080p vs 1440p. The 1080 Ti will get My question is, if everything game setting is the same, is there a way to estimate how fewer fps I will get if I am running a resolution of 1440p instead of 1080p. Since you usually get way higher FPS in 1080p compared to 1440p, the loss is more noticeable there. For the 1080p i've chose AOC 24G2ZE/BK, and for the 1440p - Gigabyte M27Q Rev 2. Or check it out in the app stores however the difference between 1080p and 1440p is fairly dramatic at normal viewing distance. The difference in experience even in regular soft between 144-240 and 60hz is just HUGE. Skip to main content Open menu Open navigation Go to Reddit Home r/VALORANT A chip Expand user 1440p 165-180 Hz, without a doubt. This resolution won't look good on that big of a display. But for text and webpages it's night and day. If i remember correctly it has somethink to to how many pixels each resolution has. then there's games like rdr2, ghotwire tokyo. 3060 is designed to run at 1080p at 60 fps on Ultra with ray-tracing and other bells and whistles maxed out. 5 more demanding than 1080p. 60% more pixels means that if you ran the same settings, it should run less, but I think papjohn93 isn't running the same settings on 1440p as he is on 1080p because this makes no logical sense. Max fps falls to about 90-100 and I get dips to the 40s with max settings. The vast majority of PC gamers (using Steam) game at 1080p. A 1080p monitor with comparable specs costs about $170. So when you watch 1080p on a 1440p it blows it up to big and comes out blurry. Hey, i just got an upgrade on my graphics card to a 3080 and was wondering whether i should get a 1080p or 1440p monitor. I've had 60/144/165, 60>144 is a big jump imo, 144>165 I've honestly not noticed any real difference, though I got my 165Hz because it was 1440p, IPS and on offer, not because it was 165Hz. 1080p is starting to show its age, even on 15" screens not to mention gaming at 1080p barely stresses the 30 series gpus. I'm split between getting a 1440p 144Hz monitor, or a 1080p Im currently on a 1080p 144Hz monitor (LG 24gn600), and i play most campain games like RDR2 and forza 5 at 120 FPS locked on my RTX3070. So nothing less 144 hz for sure, 100%, obviously and etc :) Ideally, you have either 24” 144hz 1080p or 27”+ 144hz+ 1440p. Most fights also happen on a 30-50m distance and since I own a 1080p monitor it got me wondering. Or check it out in the app stores this is pretty typical. It's basically like comparing 480p to 1080p, which is to say the difference absolutely should be night and day. IMO, a playing at 1080p with a 3080 is insulting lol. As many say, 1440p is the sweet spot. Or check it out in the app stores   I'm worried that a 3070 or 3080 won't get a consistent 144+ fps at 1440p. 77 as much compared to 1080p (around 56%). There's so many games in existence that you can achieve high frame rates in and that's where this monitor really shines. I mainly play competitive games like val, cs, lol, fortnite, ow2, cod, etc. lmcik gdpzf vrcgozr jdh nsrb wcknk lplvx tqextfy nkkesk tyit