Siglent oscilloscope vs rigol reddit. It's reasonably priced and very compact.

Siglent oscilloscope vs rigol reddit Then his oscilloscope goes on "ready mode" and as soon as he presses the button to charge the capacitor the curve shows right away on the screen of his scope. Rigol oscilloscopes have higher memory depth(24Mpts). I am in my second year of college doing electrical engineering and I have yet to do much with an oscilloscope until maybe now, so an entry-level one would be nice. I mostly use the Rigol. Dec 7, 2015 · You could consider the Instek GDS 2104A or Instek GDS-2104E as well. The winner in this category is the Siglent Company because their models tend to have a bigger screen than oscilloscopes produced by Rigol. Im looking at either Siglent SDS1202X-E or a Rigol DS1202Z-E, both about 400 euro's here. ca has them for near-identical pricing right now, and price being equal, the Siglent is the better scope. There is no comparison there between the digilent and the rigol. SDS1104X-E 100MHz don't understand the difference :) RIGOL 4-Channel 50MHz Digital Oscilloscope (DS1054Z). The Rigol DS1054Z has 4 Channels but only has 50 MHz of bandwidth, while the Siglent has 2 Channels but 200 MHz. Mar 7, 2024 · The new Rigol DHO800 and Siglent SDS800X lines have been discussed and compared ad nauseam. It look The Rigol DS1054z which is cheaper but only 50Mhz (easily unlocked to 100Mhz). The MSO5000 Series provides some of the strongest value available in the The oscilloscope in the Analog Discovery 2 isn't as good as a Rigol or Siglent, with only 100Ms/s vs 1Gs/s, but it's ok for low speed applications. Either go the cheap route, or step up to more more with more features. Hello, I am sorry if this question gets asked too many times but I could not find direct comparison between those two oscilloscopes and I need help to decide. A Fluke 115 for around $150 on eBay doesn't have the same uA or temp capability, but can do true RMS, which is the biggest thing I found lacking in Considering that most oscilloscopes integrate a display, this is something that may happen. Operate with 2 channels get 500MS/s, 4 channels get 250MS/s. Been trying to settle up and buy a digital oscilloscope for some time. Oscilloscopes produced by Siglent can Feb 9, 2021 · Rigol and Siglent has the possibility to unlock it all Keysight is quite expensive to increase BW or options Rigol and Siglent can be upgarded with 16 digital channels (not possible on the Keysight) User Interface Rigol was not very polished and I found it to be a little "messy" Siglent is much more my way (but I always will prefer separate I think this kinda explains how Rigol got its foot in the door, by producing a quality scope for HP/Agilent. I have looked at several scopes in my price range, including: Rigol MSO5104 Siglent SDS2104X Plus 4Ch 100MHz Apr 14, 2024 · RIGOL Technologies and Siglent are both solutions in the Oscilloscopes category. io/project/5807-driverless-rigol-ds1054z-screen-capture-over-lan which look encouraging. just bought an sds1104x-e. On the other hand, Rigol oscilloscopes tend to have a steep learning curve and can be more difficult to navigate. But Rigol has its own bug involving screen recording- if you turn on screen recording while you're using the web control to drive the scope, the web control window stops updating. However, the Siglent SDS1104X-E looks very promising as it is much newer and has mixed-signal capabilities (upgradable through extra cost though - not very cheap IIRC), and does not downscale its sampling rate as much as the Rigol one when using all four channels (Siglent: 1 GHz w/ 1 or 2 ch, and 500 MHz quad, while the Rigol one downscales to Look at the "DS1104Z Plus", the big brother of the "DS1054Z" from the same scope family. The Picoscope always felt like more work for some reason and having the extra screen of the 'scope can be handy if you're cross-checking something on Feb 13, 2021 · For basic operations the Siglent and GW Instek scope are very close where the Rigol is an older model but as others noted it has some functions the others don't have. Well, the siglent sds 1104x-e is for sure the more capable oscilloscope, but it is significantly more expensive (e. Or check it out in the app stores For hobbyists, the debate usually comes down to Rigol or Siglent Buying oscilloscope: used Rigol ds1054z Vs new or siglent sds1104x-u (EU) I have an option to buy 3 years old ds1054z for 350eur, other options I have new Rigol or new Sds1104x-u which both 70 eur more. Summary: All of the oscilloscopes have acceptable save and recall capability. Rigol DS1054Z-AMZ2: Rigol DS1202Z-E: Product: 50 MHz Digital Oscilloscope with 4 channels plus 12 Mpts memory, 1 GS/s sampling rate: 50 MHz Digital Oscilloscope with 4 channels plus 12 Mpts memory, 1 GS/s sampling rate: 200 MHz Digital Oscilloscope with 2 channels, 1GS/s, 24Mpoint memory: Rating (518) (0) (38) Price: In Stock: Oscilloscopes You'd probably look for having 1GHz bandwidth WHILE using two channels. As a hobbyist I didn't hesitate unlocking 100 --> 200 MHz and got the more expensive model "for free". A bit pricier than the Rigol, which is par for the course. Honestly, I have a budget Rigol 1052E, and I've used a Rigol 1054Z+, and I'd spend the extra on the Siglent if you can afford it. However, older scopes or those with problems are NOT good to learn with. So please help me with this Hacked Rigol 1054Z (100MHz), Hantek 2C10 or 5102 the usual suspects, they will all work great. Affiliate links t Cheaper devices are usually limited in some way, lack of support, etc. I don't expect to use it particularly frequently, but any time there's a bug that a state/timing analysis system can't solve (such as observing voltage sags or line noise or RC curves), an o-scope is really the best/only tool for the job. There's a great chart here for feature comparison: I'm sure there are people out there whose needs exceed what the Saleae can do but at that point we're probably talking about an order of magnitude more expense than an entry level scope like a Rigol. The Rigol's is okay, but until its 27" it's not big enough. 55 votes, 62 comments. Personally, if you are a beginner I would probably but a Rigol, it will likely be more scope then you really need for the time being and is more robust then a really good quick instrument will be. Seems to have more/better features. I love my old 34401A DMMs which can now be had on eBay for $400, but my $1700 34465A has logging and graphing functions, and screenshots can easily be grabbed over a network connection and dropped into a report. But, I'm still left uncertain. People rave about siglent, but I'm just not seeing the benefit of dropping rigol, after being a user for more than 15 years. Finding one that is new enough to have an external display connector or a GPIB or USB interface might be worthwhile to you. Add a low amp clamp and a high amp clamp from AESwave and possibly a pressure transducer, and you can test anything that a more expensive automotive branded scope will do. You might want to consider MSO (Mixed Signal Oscilloscopes) which is a combination of Oscilloscope and Digital Logic Analyzer. You can even mount it on a VESA monitor mount. Oct 15, 2023 · Screen captures were easier for me on the Rigol, because of the rendering bug on the siglent. Rigol doesn’t even make a handheld. Looking to buy an oscilloscope for hobbyist use with room to grow. I'd go as far as to say if the cost difference is of no concern, the Siglent 1104X-E is definitely better than the Rigol DS1054Z. Others have proposed a Rigol model, which I think I'll check out myself. Jun 4, 2021 · I'm not sure how they get to over 100Mhz with 4 channels running with only 2. I found stuff like this: https://hackaday. With a 100MHz bandwidth, and a maximum record length of 50 Mpts, and has 2 analog channels + 16 digital channels mixed signal analysis ability. I bought mine for 350 dollars. You can't just use the passive 200 MHz probe (with a long ground lead) that comes with your 200 MHz scope and expect the 20 MHz square wave on you board to come up as a nice crisp 20 MHz square wave on your scope screen. I had this exact model. Overall it's very good. However on my oscilloscope, whenever I set the time scale to 100mhz+ there's a message in the bottom saying "acquiring" with a loading bar. When looking at the beginners' oscilloscope market, the /r/askelectronics redditors summarize things thusly: Buying new: The Rigol range are worth a look. Mar 5, 2024 · While Rigol is better in terms of hardware solution and inovation as well as design and physical contruction, Siglent is also better than Rigol in terms of software application What is the general consensus about which unit is better built, the DHO800 series or the SDS800X HD series. The advantage compared to a logic analyser is you can see exactly how signals look like, and sometimes, they aren't as "digital" as you'd expect. Boot Time. Single 1GS/s and a bit slower than the Siglent when I tried it (but also a bit older). Not the worst thing in the world, but can definitely be annoying when you're already frustrated by an issue in your circuit. The SDS804X HD is a great scope for analog signals. I was about to get the Rigol DHO804 when it was released, but it had a lot of bugs reported on eevblog forum so I decided to wait another 6 months to get the siglent equivalent. Hey guys, just getting started in electronics and wanted to invest into a good oscilloscope. I can get cheaper the Siglent by about 130 USD. I see several models under USD$400, which should be even less if paying in pounds. Found out that the unit is back ordered and won't be shipped for at least a month. It has two 1Gsps ADCs, not one like the Rigol. The real benefit is all of the other built in test equipment, which again isn't going to be as good as standalone units. I would suggest saving up for a new Rigol, Siglent, or similar "cheap" modern scope. (some lessons I learned googling this rubbish) SIGLENT’s new SDS812X HD series high resolution digital storage oscilloscope is based on 2 GSa/s, 12-bit Analog-Digital Converters and front ends with excellent noise floor performance. I would rather expect it for R&S but I haven't looked at the data sheet. 1054Z - $350, 4 analog channels, no digital channels, 50 MHz Bandwidth Siglent Technologies SDS1202X-E 200 mhz Digital Oscilloscope 2 Channels. I understand the main differences, and the two things that peak my interest are that, from what I've read, the FFT appears to be better on the Siglent, and the Siglent has double the sampling rate in multi-channel use. Rigol vs Siglent also comes down to preference of the user interface. I've watched a pretty substantial amount of YouTube videos, have read the wiki and searched both this sub and Reddit as a whole . Enjoy the journey. extremely happy with it so far. The reseller stocks all models of Rigol, Siglent and R&S and support is good. I'm kind of the opposite, had a Picoscope and have an oscilloscope (the ubiquitous Rigol DS1054Z). Reply reply Jun 29, 2020 · I've been using a Siglent SDS-1202X-E (It's the $380 model, if that's more helpful than alphabet soup). Digital vs analog for me depends on what I’m doing. You will find quite a large selection of lab scopes on Amazon. One of my probes broke and they sent a new one within three days. Now I doubt myself again and wonder if I should downgrade to the Rigol DS1054Z. Here’s a quick comparison table between the two scopes: Metric Rigol Siglent Sampling Rate 1 ADC at 1. For the desk based stuff, then a Rigol or Siglent would be my choice if I was in the market for a new scope. I literally just purchased a couple for work like 30 seconds ago, they're good enough for most things and because they're battery powered you don't have to worry as much about accidentally frying your inputs by measuring high common mode voltages (which is why we buy them, cheap Yep, I've got a RIGOL DS-1054z 50mhz 4 channel scope that I cracked to unlock 100mhz, way more than capable for the job of synth stuff. They claim these will probably offer me similar results with the main difference being the overal quantity and support of the Owon being maybe a little bit less than Rigol and Siglent. They just released the DHO800 series and the SDS1104X-E is around 6 years old. Rigol and Siglent are the best bang for your buck for hobbiests Right now, the Rigol has the better entry level offering. Dec 29, 2020 · They sell all of these brands but not all the same models, so for the Rigol is selected the 200mhz (DS1202Z-E) for their comparison. Usually I do stuff on the computer before I use it, and it messes with the flow because it has to take a significant portion of my screen real estate. I don't have a lot of complaints. Also, the use of a standalone oscilloscope is a lot more comfortable than a USB one. youtu Looking for recommendations for a budget oscilloscope - In particular, I aim to use it for troubleshooting various analog and serial protocols: Serial protocols (rs232, rs485, rs422, 2-wire and 4-wire) The RIGOL MSO5000 Series compares strongly with the DPO/MSO2000 & TBS2000 from Tek, the DSOX/MSOX2000 from Keysight, and the RTB2000 from Rohde & Schwarz on price while providing superior performance specifications, rich advanced analysis features, and next generation UI. Seconding the siglent SDS1204 that was mentioned earlier, I think it will be a good middle ground between the rigol and keysight. I'm not sure what your use cases are, and explaining everything you might want to do with it will help us make a recommendation. Jesus! I'm sold on the Siglent SPD-3000X-E (-E being the lower resolution version). Whereas, the Siglent has a memory depth of only 2Mpts. You could take a look at the Rigol DSO800 Series. Best bang for buck at the moment. Likewise, using all 4 inputs with the Siglent gives you 500mhz each - 250mhz on the Rigol. Want to get some opinions and from those who have either. With a 100MHz bandwidth, and a maximum record length of 50 Mpts, and has 4 analog channels + 16 digital channels mixed signal analysis ability. The Siglent also does Bode plotting. I was initially leaning towards the Rigol, however after doing some research, I've found a lot of people having issues I've done lots of coding projects and Arduino projects, but I've never used an oscilloscope and want to learn how. retired test engineer here. Anyone interested can go to the test equipment forum on EEVBlog for more details. Amazon. While Siglent Technologies claims victory on the Rigol DS1054Z vs Siglent SDS1104X-E debate, it’s your decision which one to buy in the end Hey Guys, I'm looking into buying a oscilloscope and I don't really know what to pick. Siglent VS. It reveals that the Rigol DS1102E is the most popular of the sort of entry level digital scopes, but OWON SDS7102 is $50 more, has a much larger screen, and a LAN port. about 130 Euros more than the rigol ds1054z). While I only have a 2 channel scope, I have one that has built in UART/I2C/SPI/LIN decode (SDS1202X-E), of which I use the UART decode a fair bit (at 115kbaud), and have looked at I2C as well. Dec 18, 2023 · IIRC a while ago Martin posted a video showing both Rigol and Siglent 1100-something- and the Siglent scope was much more tedious to setup. . 25GS/sec 2 ADC at 1GS/s each Analog Bandwidth (un-hacked) 125Mhz 100Mhz ADC resolution 12 bits 8 bits Waveform capture rate 1,000,000 wfm/s 100,000wfm/s(normal mode) or 400,000 wfm/s(sequence mode) Screen 7" 1024x600 touchscreen 7" 800x480 no With the quality of the Chinese-designed equipment like Rigol and Siglent getting so good, it's much less clear-cut. Btw, the rigol is an excellent scope for its price. I've mostly been using a Seleae logic analyzer paired with a handheld multimeter, but now I have the budget to spend. 6 inch) As for the Hantek, there's a huge Jul 21, 2018 · Siglent habe ich erst etwas später als Rigol wahrgenommen, muss aber sagen, dass Siglent nach meiner Meinung irgendwie immer ein Schritt voraus ist. Both of those companies have upped the game of their entry level offerings to compete with folks like Rigol and Siglent - both of whom are perfectly legit options. My main goals of using oscilloscope: Design a good power supply for microcontrollers and fpga. If it's the company's dime, I'd get a Keysight oscilloscope. Then, owning both devices, I find the build quality of the siglent not on par with the rigol, which just feels beefier in material and construction. I mean I am the idiot who bought the Hantek despite knowing better (or at least I thought I knew better, maybe I am even dumber than I think) so maybe don’t take my opinions seriously. The only major difference is a wave length which is only 16Kpts for Siglent model vs 2 MPts for Rigol. The instructor is using a Rigol DS2072A Osc. For a DMM, A Fluke 17B+ is about $150 on eBay, and can read uA and temperature. PicoScope vs Rigol) As a wild guess, the cost difference originates from the additional development effort it takes to produce and maintain a software suite (and cross-platform drivers) in addition to the firmware. If on a budget, Siglent makes good stuff, and is what I use at home. I would avoid Rigol for professional use—they're great for hobbyists but have their limitations. I have been on the Siglent website and had a couple of questions: Differences Between Rigol vs. It has been commented before that sometimes paying a small premium for Siglent is justified. 5 or fewer samples - seems like guesswork. The 7000 Series is the world's most powerful and affordable mid-range oscilloscope. After several years tinkering with electronics I have decided to bite the bullet and buy an oscilloscope. From my research, it seems folks are generally recommending Siglent, Rigol or Digilent AD2. Most of the time the adalm2000 gets the job done. History view. The Tektronix 3000 series are not in the ballpark. However, some users prefer Rigol’s more customizable interface options. It is not possible to say which oscilloscope is fundamentally better or offers better value for money. PC/USB Scope: Only for the most basic of measurements. Hantek PC based might be tempting for some, but the software is mediocre in my experience (I have 6254BD 4CH 250 MHz for computer capture, but the Siglent seems more robust for general use) Nov 2, 2024 · The question is, which one do you need? While Siglent Technologies has a better oscilloscope, some users may not need all that power. Very fast and responsive. The Siglent is a 2-channel scope but Rigol Dec 30, 2023 · Then Siglent introduces the 12 bit version with added features and faster processing!! Then Rigol introduces the little 12 bit DHO800, and this is a nice little low cost entry level DSO with 12 bit ADCs and such, which we evaluated for a client to use with their product (they needed a small form factor with VEAS mount). Rigol DS1054Z ($375) vs. In the 2000 series I prefer the Siglent. I own a Rigol DS1054Z (modern low end digital) and a Tektronix 2232 (digital phosphor; early 90s and once pretty expensive). Siglent has responded with like 12 bit scopes. Both have 7 inch screens, but the Rigol is higher resolution (1024x600) vs (800x480) and has a touch screen. My Ds1102c still works after all this time. There is a new Siglent SDS1104X-U 100MHz just released, which I have in mind. You can also get the SDS1104X-E/U and hack it for more bandwidth. Hardware math functions. Is in the same price category as the Siglent and HMO. Keysight DSOX1102A ($675) First off, I want to say that I've read the wiki:) I'm wondering, if the price difference between them wasn't a factor for you, which makes a better oscilloscope? I'm concerned with quality, reliability, serviceability, "which is more of a joy to use," software quality (I hear the Keysight is So I'm in the market for a digital oscilloscope and I would like some opinions on these ones. Mar 16, 2021 · Hello! I am coming out of college and am about to purchase my first oscilloscope! I am currently torn between the features of the Rigol MSO5074, and the Keysight DSOX1204G. Oct 1, 2024 · 🏷️ Rigol Oscilloscopes ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ For this article, we decided to take a closer look at their products to understand how they differentiate and which one might be the better value for money. There's even been some hardware hacks to add the logic analyzer and add more ram. Rigol and Siglent both have some very capable 4 channel digital lab scopes available for under $500. I ordered a DSLogic Plus LA, so I'm hopefully covered for diagnosing the SPI comms between ADC and MCU. I have some minor issues with the 1054 holding a signal steady, gotta really tweak the trigger level to get it to lock in, a problem I didn't have with my two channel Siglent. SIGLENT’s new SDS814X HD series high resolution digital storage oscilloscope is based on 2 GSa/s, 12-bit Analog-Digital Converters and front ends with excellent noise floor performance. I don't regret it. I mainly want 4 channels and 200MHz BW (although 100MHz is fine too). I personally have a Siglent sds1204x-e, which you can control remotely over a web interface. The Rigol's are software calculated so they update ~2 times per second and there's no sinx/x interpolation so they look terrible. They look pretty good. I traded for siglent because it had more channels. The market for used scopes is extremely small in Denmark, if not completely non-existent, so that is not an option. Nov 2, 2024 · In this case, there are three that continuously pop up whenever you discuss oscilloscopes: Rigol, Hantek, and Siglent. Heck, even at the entry level, this still holds if you only look at semi-reputable vendors (e. In most cases, the sample rate of Rigol and Siglent scopes are the same(1GSa/s). Feature-3: Memory Depth. Siglent offers better specs and has traditionally proved more reliable and less buggy. But in order to actually see anything accurately at +100 MHz, you have to start paying attention to your probes and probing technique. For basic tasks, Rigol’s unit may be the best choice. The work I'd be using it for microcontrollers and low-level communications. I don't want to ask about specifics but since Rigol and Siglent have launched their 12bit models (DHO800 series and SDS800x HD respectively) is it worth investigating other oscilloscopes at the current market for general usage around this price point? Siglent are relatively new (certainly to me) but, unlike companies like Rigol, whose offerings are cheap, low performance models, Siglent seem to be offering real competition to the big boys. Larger screen. The Siglent SDS1202X-E is also an often-quoted 'budget' brand / model. 8% mindshare in O, compared to Siglent’s 31. Hi! I'm looking for a good entry-level signal generator for my lab. g. RIGOL Technologies holds a 24. If you buying your first go for the 4 channels. Hello everyone, I'm currently weighing my options between the Rigol DHO804 and the Rigol DHO914S. Audio stuff? Analog is just fine. Feb 23, 2018 · I pulled the trigger and purchased the Siglent SDS1204X-E for a little north of 700 UDS with discount. Sporting a 12 bit ADC vs an 8 bit on the siglent is another win. So basically I am deciding between the Siglent SDS814X HD and Rigol 914. Check out the size difference between Total newbie - never used an Oscilloscope except in college. Once you genuinely outgrow the thing you will know what you actually need for the next one. The "DS1104Z Plus" has a logic analyzer connector on the front which provides the ability to add 16 logic analyzer channels after buying the logic analyzer cable, but if you buy the "DS1054Z" there is no way to add the extra logic analyzer channels later. But how do these compare to Owon's 12 and 14 bit low cost scopes? Mar 8, 2023 · Among the Rigol DS1054Z and Siglent SDS1202X-E, we’ve arrived at the conclusion that Siglent is a better choice for both begginers and intermediate users, while Rigol would be better suited for advanced users. Conclusion. In general Rigol and Siglent make decent scopes for very attractive prices. These two are close to the same price ($250 for the unit and ~$300 for the rigol) Both 2 channel but the rigol is a 200 MHz and the Unit is 100MHz. ). Thanks, Dave The only suggestion I'd make that others haven't is to check out the entry level Keysight and Tektronix offerings. But both are great scopes however Rigol is also good, small FFT size but if you don’t care about that it shouldn’t disappoint you. You can make it 100MHz with a little trick you can find on YouTube Mar 2, 2021 · Here is a very handy list of scopes: Scope Spreadsheets Keep in mind that some require you to purchase a license to get some functions. 3D printers are handy for this. Or this one! Rigol DS1102E Digital Oscilloscopes - Bandwidth: 100 Mhz, Channels: 2. This is not a given for Siglent or Rigol. Rigol DS1102E VS OWON SDS7102 Done a little bit research. For Siglent, the SDS1104-XE seems to offer a lot of bang for the buck, but I guess a little over your budget. Focusing first on mostly analog stuff but would like to get into some digital stuff later. If you compare the Rigol ds1000 series with Agilent's old dso1xxx series, you can see the similarities. Go to Amazon and search for a tablet oscilloscope, a 100MHz one and probes and accessories will be about $200. Der Spekki hat ein größeres Display, zudem ein besseres Phasenrauschen, das Multimeter ist wesentlich ansprechender als das Rigol etc. Rigol offered extended 5 year warranty too. The more expenisve route will always give you a nicer solution. $999 : Rigol MSO5074 (70MHz 4chan 8bit 100/200Mpts) (16chan logic analyzer connector on front) $999 : Rigol DHO1074 (70MHz 4chan 12bit 50/100Mpts) (logic analyzer connector not available) $3280 : Siglent SDS2104X HD (100MHz 4chan 12bit 200Mpts) (16chan logic analyzer connector on front) Special Rigol promotions until September 30, 2023: A higher sample rate is required while getting full bandwidth. I actually just purchased the Siglent SDS1104X-E after humming and hawing about it and the DS1054Z for a while. These are all 400$ plus which is beyond my budget. Rigol Oscilloscopes Comparison. 100 MHz 2 channels 24/12 Mpts memory vs 16/8 on the DS1052E (though the DS1052E has a "long" memory mode whatever that is) more trigger types than the DS1052E protocol trigger/decode support larger display (7 inch vs 5. Thanks for the information here but I have to ask do you own a Rigol dho804? I am reading in the comments on a couple youtube videos that there has been a firmware update and they are unable to unlock the extra bandwith, which was a big draw to the 804 vs the 814. Tektronix oscilloscopes are known for their intuitive, user-friendly interfaces. Probes are much higher quality than Hey all! I am currently in the market for upgrading from my Rigol DS1054Z to something with higher bandwidth I had the rigol DHO924(s) and the siglent sds824x in mind, but I am torn whether 250 MHz is realistic with 1. Given my price range, I've looked mainly at the Siglent SPD3303X-E and the Rigol DP832. A contractor I work with has some $50k magic box from Keysight that he says can do all sorts of fancy stuff. I prefer having the separate stand-alone piece of kit which I can just power on when I need it. If you aren't sure exactly but really want to buy, I'd suggest going for the bottom-tier 4 channel Rigol/Siglent if you can't find a used scope, since if you need to upgrade later anyway you'll have a cheap backup scope/be out the least amount of money. Jun 29, 2020 · I'm looking for a new mid-range scope, 2Ch, 2GSa/s would be about right with 200-300Mhz bandwidth. For basic circuits I'd pick one of the 1000 X or 2000 X series models. RIGOL Technologies is ranked #2, while Siglent is ranked #1. Winner: Siglent. The GDS 2104E has a lower sample frequency (1GHz / 2GHz), more memory (10Mpt/2Mpt) and a higher frame update rate (120k/s / 80k/s) than the older GDS 2104A, which has a logic analyser and generator option. I suggest something from the Rigol DS1000 family. Plus lower bandwidth and you see where the extra $$$ went to for the Siglent. in my experience one very rarely needs high accuracy vertical for scope measurements. Compared to my old scope feels almost like analog. as far as 10 bit vs 12 bit vertical res goes i wouldn't be too concerned. the equivalent rigol looks very similar. AFAICT the Rigol can't store multiple traces in memory and let you look back into history. Right now I want to decide between the Rigol DS1054Z, the Rigol DS 1074Z Plus, and the Rigol 1074Z-S Plus and I have a few questions for you great people. The 1104 has 14M vs the Rigol's 24M. In my country Rigol DS1054Z (50MHz), Hantek DSO4104B (100MHz) and OWON SDS1104 (100MHz) are available and are at the same price. SIGLENT’s new SDS812X HD series high resolution digital storage oscilloscope is based on 2 GSa/s, 12-bit Analog-Digital Converters and front ends with excellent noise floor performance. May 7, 2019 · Besides Rigol and Hantek, you can also look into the Siglent series of scopes. Not bad. Definitely the best bang/buck you can get. Logged There are small lies, big lies and then there is what is on the screen of your oscilloscope. As far as boot time goes, the oscilloscopes produced by Rigol usually tend to boot up faster than oscilloscope produced by Siglent. I'm using a Siglent SDS 1104X-E. The Ridol shares 1 ADC for all 4 ports, so using any 2 inputs on the Rigol drops the sample rate to 500, whereas the Siglent will run at 1ghz when simultaneously using channel 1 and 3 (or 2 and 4). The Rigol 1054z is like the Hakko 888d in the sense that its the old reliable but there is better bang for your buck nowadays. Both Rigol & Siglent can be hacked easily to increase the capability already designed in their front end. Aug 3, 2022 · Hi everyone, I'm going to buy a 4 channel oscilloscope for about $400. 🏷️ Rigol DS1054Z ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ In this article, we’ll break down the differences, explain what each offers, and help you decide which oscilloscope is the best choice for your needs. I bought a rigol 4 channel 100MHz and boy ain't that a treat. Since it's just for hobby I don't need the oscilloscope right now, so waiting is OK. Mir scheint Siglent wird Rigol irgendwann mal überholen Oct 1, 2024 · Two popular four channel oscilloscopes, the Rigol DS1054Z and the Siglent SDS1104X-E, are often compared because of their features and affordability. The mysteries of x1 oscilloscope probes revealed: https://www. don't see where there's much difference. I'm so grateful to all of you, at least I made one decision to take an oscilloscope with 4 channels so I need to make a decision between these Siglent SDS1104X-U vs. These two look pretty similar. Agreed, Siglent SDS 1104X-E is very nice for hobbyist/prosumer level. Note that the Rigol says "24 Mpts with the deep memory option" but it does not list what you get without that option. Having lots of storage memory is important too. It handles like a pro scope. . I am curious if there are similar capabilities possible with the Siglent 1104. Anyone around that can 'clue me in' on the Siglent over the older Rigol. Or even a higher end Rigol. I'm looking at the Rigol DS2302 and the Siglent SD2352. The Keysight has a save to USB button that will save to whatever mode it is in (screenshot, scope setting, etc. Dcode some serial protocol. I also really like it, but there are a lot of Videos and Forums entries which are a couple of years old now, and I don't want to buy an Oscilloscope, when in half a year a new version of it will be released. Aug 18, 2018 · Hi, I'm curious about the Siglent SDS1104X-E vs. The RIGOL 7000 Series compares strongly on price while providing better performance specifications, rich advanced analysis features, and next generation UI. $280 regular non-clearance price). EEVblog #891 - Siglent SSA3021X vs Rigol DSA815 Spectrum Analyser. -500 uV / div range is really, really useful and is very much worth having. Rigol MSO5104 vs Keysight DSOX1204A (100Mhz) but I haven't touched my oscilloscope once since getting a Salae logic analyzer, which does everything I need and is I'd like to purchase an oscilloscope for hobbyist stuff. Feature-4: Channels. Just my thoughts on what would be a good buy. Also, consider memory depth. When you factor in Siglent’s product dev momentum plus the user response around here I think you are likely headed for a Siglent. Choose your fighter. Most ‘scopes have a built-in 1kHz square-wave calibration signal to check your probes with. Rigol DS1054Z. You can't be doubting your test equipment, and oscilloscope repair is not a beginner activity. Tektronix Oscilloscopes Usability and interface. Plus at the moment the Rigol 1054z seems to be out of stock and well over trending price it used to be. Hello guys! Do any of you guys know a place to buy a benchtop digital Oscilloscope in Sri Lanka, with following specs; Preferred Brands: Siglent, Techtronix, Rigol, Keysight, GW Instek Channels: 4 (w/wo serial decoder) Bandwidth: minimum 100Mhz With FFT Sampling Rate: 1Gs/Sec An analog scope from the 1990's or later, in known good working condition, is fine to learn with. Hello, I have been looking around the Internet for a good beginner budget Oscilloscope, and everybody recommends the DS1054z. It's reasonably priced and very compact. That might be all you need. but if you are on Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. 0% mindshare. Rigol DS1054Z or Siglent SDS1202X-E for ADC project I'm starting a project attempting to interface a 24bit precision ADC (LTC2512-24, Fs=819kSPS) with an STM32 MCU. 13 to protest Reddit's API changes which affect 3rd party Reddit apps. Some of the reviews on the bad end freaked me out a bit so before I make a big purchase, I’d figure I’d get some opinions , or if you guys have better models you’ve used please share ! The Rigol PVP3150 vs the Siglent PP510 oscilloscope probes in x1 mode. BTW, rigol manufactured scopes for HP/Agilent, so there's that. Go for a proper 'scope if possible. I’m an EE student, so professional in the making hopefully, but this is still just one guy’s opinion. The Siglent can also do automated Bode plots with a Siglent function generator (or YouTube hacks to use some other function generators), which can be useful for stability analysis. (fwiw, I have 4 oscilloscopes: 3 analog Tektronix and 1 Rigol - YMMV). I was thinking about investing between $350-$500 and found the following scopes: Siglent SDS1104X-E -- $499 4 channels 100 mhz Siglent SDS1202X-E -- $379 2 channels 200 mhz As far as I know, both the cheaper Siglent and Rigol 70 MHz oscilloscopes can be hacked to allow for 350 MHz bandwidth. Comparisons. Both are known for their quality and performance, but there are some key differences between the two that you should know about before buying a product. Mar 31, 2024 · Net, net: a big part of what makes both Rigol and Siglent scopes excellent is the user community. 25 Gsamples/s or that it is fine. I prefer a 4 channel scope because those channels can be quite useful and to my knowledge both Siglent and Rigol scopes can be software "upgraded" to more functions and bandwidth. The new rigol dh8x4 oscopes come in at a good price and as standard can be software hacked up to the dh9x4 level. I saw a review of a Siglent spectrum analyser on youtube - they are expensive even from Siglent (3k) but the features are like a 10k Agilent model. Then Hantek, then FNIRSI. I have Tektronix, Rigol & Siglent. Compare RIGOL DS7000 and MSO7000 oscilloscopes with Keysight DSOX3000T and Tektronix MDO3000. Now, being an IT tech person, I really ought to have been able to do this on computer, but I got the masking tape and tape measure out. - UI on the Siglent is really pretty good, and the cursors are about the same level of annoyance as any scope. People tend to equate Rigol and siglent, but I think Rigol builds the better scope in my opinion. Mar 21, 2019 · The Rigol has the benefit of the really easy unlocks (though the Siglent unlocks too, right?), but the Siglent is modestly more capable and is more responsive to use. It's fast enough that you can easily debug microcontroller stuff too, so if you want to try making more technically involved modules, it's right there for you to use. Minimum of 2 scope channels, minimum of 8 digital logic channels (though 16 is more likely a minimum that you can get), minimum of 100MHz bandwidth (higher if you can afford it). For embedded development, you may need more scope channels or logic analyzer channels to decode UART / I2C / SPI bus data. The Rigol DS1054Z oscilloscope is about $400, and is a great budget scope with a good support community for hobbyists. Jul 17, 2018 · Anyway then I decided to check the size of the bigger Siglent out, vs the Rigol. Not sure if that makes a huge difference if I’m still a newb. When buying an oscilloscope, you can take a look at any calibration stickers the instrument might Hi, I've got about $10k for a new oscilloscope and am looking for recommendations. Go to arrow, buy a rigol ds1054z and if you create a new account you get a discount. As I see the instructor is capable of viewing a real-time acquisition almost like an horizontal "sweep" going through the screen. If you want a kind of good enough hobby scope for this and other projects I would choose a Siglent SDS1104X-E, or more versatile but more expensive, the Rigol MSO5074. My journey in test electronics so far has involved using an Arduino Mega and a Saleae USB, focusing on learning electronics, repairing home equipment, and a bit of device hacking. When it comes to oscilloscopes, Siglent and Rigol are two of the most well-known brands. Interface is very good. The Rigol DS1102Z-E offers great value for the price. You mention a lot of analog components and you won't get much use out of a logic analyzer for these. Fast memory to capture a spike and being able to "zoom in" on a portion of it is expensive. I recently ordered my first oscilloscope and settled with a "traditional one" - the Siglent SDS1104X-E, but at first I was… Jun 29, 2020 · I might have gone with Owon at the time, but the availability (for private customers) and support didn't look good in EU, so I went with Siglent. That being said, I do use a function-generator for checking out audio amplifiers, and I run a cable from the generator’s sync-out terminal to the oscilloscope’s external-trigger input, which keeps the horizontal-sweep locked-in while the test-probes are are being moved Jul 15, 2019 · The Rigol and Siglent have dedicated screenshot buttons. If you aren't after EMI problems for certification (which you should have >3 GHz bandwidth anyways), Oscilloscope. I'm looking to buy a lab DC Power Supply to work on commercial radio systems. 4 channels all the way! You can probe a three phase h-bridge, SPI (MOSI,MISO and Clk) which you can't really with a 2 channel. I've got a Rigol MSO5074 that was about a grand, and I only turn it on when I need the bandwidth. In the 1000 series I prefer the Rigol, then Siglent. Plus all the knobs and buttons make the rigol fun to use :). Debating which one is the best brand between Rigol vs Siglent vs Hantek leads us to an interesting discussion because each brand is great in its own right. A lot. Oscilloscopes convert electrical signals into visual waveforms. Money is a bit tight for me at the moment, but I have found a Siglent model that gets good reviews and seems like a good option for me to start with; it is the SDS1052dl+. A cheap one would be fantastic, my max budget is $250, so pre-owned is fine with me. Ask questions about how to use them, share your favorite tips, or post a picture of that one crazy measurement you finally captured. r/embedded Dec 23, 2024 · In this video 'Top 3 Oscilloscopes under $400; Rigol vs Siglent vs Uni-T' I will demonstrate features of the best Oscilloscopes under $400. In terms of oscilloscopes, I'm wondering if there is a particular scope that you think might be a better option. I see handheld oscilloscopes with multimeter and AFG combos which look very appealing. , and once you hit the $400 price point for the Analog Discovery, you might just consider springing for a low-end Siglent or Rigol. The models you should look at are: Rigol DS1054Z (4-channel, 50 MHz bw) Siglent SDS 1202X-E (2-channel, 200 MHz bw) Jul 16, 2023 · What price range are you looking at? Rigol Clearance has the DS1102Z-E for $223 right now (vs. ibhjol eby iqslj ledi scilh mlzhoej sdzb bpff jqzkyrnn dth